首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of two antibiotic regimens (piperacillin plus amikacin versus ceftazidime plus amikacin) as empiric therapy for febrile neutropenic patients with cancer.
【2h】

Comparison of two antibiotic regimens (piperacillin plus amikacin versus ceftazidime plus amikacin) as empiric therapy for febrile neutropenic patients with cancer.

机译:两种抗生素方案(哌拉西林加阿米卡星与头孢他啶加阿米卡星)作为高热中性粒细胞减少性癌症患者的经验疗法的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A total of 170 febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with cancer were randomly assigned to be treated with piperacillin-amikacin or ceftazidime-amikacin. The overall response rates were similar in both groups (68 and 65%, respectively). Response rates for clinically or microbiologically documented episodes were 54.5% for piperacillin-amikacin and 58.8% for ceftazidime-amikacin. Response rates for gram-negative bacillary infections were 65 and 73%, respectively. There was also no difference for gram-positive infections (31 and 50%, respectively). The toxicities were also comparable and consisted of skin rashes, hypokalemia, and diarrhea. Vancomycin was added if the fever persisted 72 h after the beginning of therapy; it increased the response rates to 94% when used with piperacillin-amikacin and 92% when used with ceftazidime plus amikacin. Our results suggest that the combinations show similar global efficacies in the treatment of febrile episodes in cancer patients.
机译:在中性粒细胞减少的癌症患者中,共170例发热发作被随机分配接受哌拉西林-阿米卡星或头孢他啶-阿米卡星治疗。两组的总缓解率相似(分别为68%和65%)。临床上或微生物学记录的发作中,哌拉西林-阿米卡星的缓解率为54.5%,头孢他啶-阿米卡星为58.8%。革兰氏阴性细菌感染的缓解率分别为65%和73%。革兰氏阳性感染也没有差异(分别为31%和50%)。毒性也相当,包括皮疹,低血钾和腹泻。如果开始治疗后72小时仍持续发烧,则加入万古霉素;当与哌拉西林-阿米卡星联合使用时,其应答率提高到94%,与头孢他啶+阿米卡星联合使用时,应答率提高到92%。我们的结果表明,这些组合在癌症患者高热发作的治疗中显示出相似的整体疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号